Tuesday, March 29, 2005
Chalk up another terrible critique of Wright. It looks as if Johnson has done very, very little reading in Wright. Of course, such study of Wright is not really necessary if all that you intend to do is churn out the same tired criticisms, gross misrepresentations and lies. It seems to me that the aim of such articles is not really to inform people, but to create a paranoia about Wright within Reformed churches. The intensity of the sectarian (and consequently, heretical) spirit of many leading writers in Reformed circles continues to astonish me.
